June 14, 200520 yr Is there any way to perform a find in script mode where the finder omits results with * in one field OR in another field? Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks.
June 14, 200520 yr Hi stubanz, and welcome to the forum. To do an OR find, you need two find requests. Enter Find Mode go to field A, and enter * new record request go to field b, and enter * perform find by hitting the Find button. HTH Lee
June 14, 200520 yr To do an OR find, you need two find requests. Right answer, but wrong question ...or the other way 'round. The header says XOR which means the truthtable produced by this bolean calc: (not A and : or (A and not : Which makes -Queue-'s answer kind of reaching in the right direction, but unfortunately the way it's implemented in filemakers requests, does it give the wrong set of records. XOR means the records where only one of the fields are empty; not both! I havn't solved the problem elegantly yet ...but there must be thrown a Contstrain ..or Extend -found set into the applied logic! MEANWHILE would I make a calc'field containing Count(FieldA,FieldB) and instead search for "1" in it.... --sd
June 14, 200520 yr What? stubanz said results with * in one field OR in another field? [color:"blue"] I responded with description of an OR find. (although I omitted the Omit) Sometimes I think you read too much into things. I try to answer the questions, not the Subjects.. lee BTW [color:"red"] stubanz stated that that was what he/she was after.
June 14, 200520 yr If I had to guess I would say it's wrong header.. Anyway, it doesn't seem too hard to do - or am I missing something? xorFind.fp7.zip
June 14, 200520 yr or am I missing something Probably not but isn't it not(a xor : ...your template shows, not that it matters much! It's the way to approach the matter indeed. Lee you said I laid too much in the header, but isn't precedence here that everyone approaching these forums are grokkers until the oppsite is established?? This means that everything is should be regarded as a challenge with a certain golfing handicap, so when a copy/paste or a question regarding repeaters pops up ... is it because the "champion" wish to get imput on deliberate denormalizing behaviours of their otherwise normalized tables at hand?? --sd
June 14, 200520 yr Lee you said I laid too much in the header, but isn't precedence here that everyone approaching these forums are grokkers until the oppsite is established?? This means that everything is should be regarded as a challenge with a certain golfing handicap, so when a copy/paste or a question regarding repeaters pops up ... is it because the "champion" wish to get imput on deliberate denormalizing behaviours of their otherwise normalized tables at hand?? I was going to ask what this meant, but decided I really don't care.
Create an account or sign in to comment