Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
the walker

confused about setting up

Recommended Posts

at the moment we have a fmserver with about 50 dbs for the office and a separate sever with fm 5.5 running and web companion serving a simplyfied web db of the one on the fm server , a news database and an orders db but as you all know 10 user maxes it out no one else can visit so i am having unlimited delivered tomorrow but am confused as to how to set up,

can any one recommend the best way to set up i have seen the examples on the fm web site but none of them apply to our scenario

to recap i have two servers a new g4 running fmserver 5 and a g3 running all the web dbs on fm5.5 stored on the same computer and webcompanion serving the cdml pages for all three dbs

i am also looking into uppgrading at least one of them to mac X (any tips on on which one would be best to upgrade(fmserver or web server) ) crazy.gif" border="0

should im ove the web dbs onto the fmserver and open remotely to the webserver or are they best left there

[ December 17, 2001: Message edited by: thewalker ]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just reinstall Unlimited over the existing 5.5 version that is serving your web DBs. Unlimited is basically EXACTLY the same as any other client version of Filemaker, it just allows an unlimited number of IPs to connect to it.

Also make sure that your web DBs are actually hosted by Filemaker Server and are just being opened by Unlimited, do not actually Host with Unlimited. You'll have better performance that way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just out of interest as i said before i am looking at upgrading to mac X but what is the best platform (9.2 os , X or PC) to run unlimited and fmserver on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by thewalker:

just out of interest as i said before i am looking at upgrading to mac X but what is the best platform (9.2 os , X or PC) to run unlimited and fmserver on

We'll get a platform flame war started here, but I'd run FM Server on Windows 2000 Server. OS 9 is NOT a server OS, and there are some issues yet with OS X and FileMaker Server 5.5. Notr major ones, but items like automated backups.

I doubt it makes much difference what platform you run FMPU on.

Old Advance Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have NT 4 sp 6 doing all FileMaker serving and Unlimited also on NT. We didn't test fully W2k for complete switch.

BTW, our company was 100% Macs 2 years ago, so no point in flaming me smile.gif" border="0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been an all Mac guy for quite a while (since the 512), I'm currently running FMP Server 5.5 on OS X (10.1.3) (G4) which is serving to an iMac (G3) running OS X and FMP 5.5, an iMac (G3) running OS 9.1 and FMPU 5, and a Mac (7100 w/ 240Mhz G3 upgrade) running OS 9.0.4 and FMPU 5 the two Unlimited machines are connected to the web via FMWSC running on a 450Mhz G3 w/ OS X Server v1.2 and Apache w/ SSL.

Someone has offered to give me a Dual 1.2 Ghz Pentium Machine with 1.5G of Ram in it, my questions is what's the BEST windows os to put on this to run FMPU ?

I believe it's got Win 2000 on it now (It might be win 2000 Server).

**Also as a note although I'm still a Mac guy to the bone, I've noticed that when I've got CDML layouts that do heavy finds (20 or 30 FMP-Include find statements on a single layout). FMP 5.5 on OS X is CONSIDERABLY SLOWER than OS 9, Now mind you I'm comparing performance on identical 333Mhz G3 iMacs (one running 9, one running X) but as we all know OS 9 is NOT an os that you can disconnect the monitor from and let it run for 2 or 3 months expecting that everything's fine... (I'm talking w/o TB2) wink.gif

Anyway so I'm expecting that the dual 1.2 Ghz PC might bring some speed increase, and hopefully stability... but what windows OS is the most stable for FMPU? I've really only been considering NT, or 2000... any input would be MUCH appreciated...

Anatoli what's your take on 2000 ? And does it help or hurt to run FMPU as a service??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arin,

Unlimited is not really for the service job.

2000 or NT -- that is the question!

We build new server this week with IIS and Unlimited, with WSC (there will be more machines) and because of security reasons it is again NT4 based. And of course there is our Security Filter securing FM on the web!

As pure Unlimited machines (not directly connected to web) W2000 has speed advantage over NT4.

But W2K and IIS are still not protected against web attacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!

Is there any advantage to running W2000 Professional vs. W2000 Server for use with FMP Unlim ?

-Arin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there it is it is not noticeable. Maybe the server has better allocation of CPU cycles for background (service) tasks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I might as well have my tuppence worth smile.gif

RE: OS 9 is NOT a server

yep couldn't agree more Apple wouldn't have sould many copies of AppleShare IP if it was wink.gif ....... There is a server version of OS 9 which is made to be run on an apple that will be used as a server ie it will have file server or data server software installed with it.

RE: OSX

I don't use it yet ... I tried it with FMServer 5.5 and had 3 Panics in a week so went back to OS 9. Some are using it sucessfully ..... not so sure yet will wait for the next release of FMServer and Client (if im still using it)

I haven't restarted my Web FMServer since before christmas. I don't run anything else on it so the OS is fairly stable.

Classic Mac OS starts running into problems if you ask it to

1. do too many things at once

or

2. do anything too intensive in the background.

When softwae vendors get their heads around OSX properly then Mac's will be far and away the better machine for intensive IO tasks due to their system architecture and they have 128 bit processing at their core ........ for instance what is the point of buying a lovely expensive SCSI controller for your extreemly expensive RAID array and whacking it in that mess of PCI - bridge - IO controller ........ and then process on a suped-up early - mid 90's 32 bit processor. Think about it wink.gif

Macs will never win the battle with WinTel in the home user or desktop wars simply because of price but as servers where performance counts they are better machines and they will have the software to match.

NB Apple are about to announce their rack mount servers - I think this shows where they are heading

smile.gifcool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well i have the same question as the person that started this. we have about 40 databases on fm server 5. i want to be able to get/post some info from these databases via the web. what do i need to do? i know that the databases needs to open and web companion on. what folders should i put them in?

Peter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leave the db's on server. Your Unlimited will connect to db via HOST button and WC on machine with Unlimited should be ON.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By puterco
      I have published my database using CDML pages and I want each web address field to act as a link witch goes directly to the address contained in the field. Example of the HTML code on the search results page:
      [FMP-FIELD: email] *how can I link this field to act as "mailto://(value in the field)"

      [FMP-FIELD:web-address] *how can I link this to act as "http://(value in the field)"
      Any help will be highly appreciated the dead line for these pages were yesterday and I need to get these features online as soon as possible. Thanks...
    • By kwatson
      Does anyone know how to allow users to input graphics into a database posted on the web? Home Page tells me container fields won't work.
    • By Randy Abulon
      Has anyone tried the connector on Windows 2000 and had some success with it? The company I work for just got FMPro5 Unlimited, but we mostly a Win2K shop; including the intranet server... How do I make it work?
    • By OSXS
      Dear all:
      I am facing the following problem: I am setting up a www-interface using CDML for the first time. I get the behavior I want, and everything works fine.
      But there's one big question: In the CDML reference, I cannot find any tags that allow authentication of users using the FM-database built-in access privileges.
      Any ideas?
      Cheers,
      Ron
    • By pem
      Does portals work i www mode?
      I have a field in a portal that works in filemaker but not in www mode. In filemaker it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.