bdam Posted August 23, 2006 Posted August 23, 2006 (edited) Just wondering what those with larger customer base (100+) do in regards to VLA Maintenance? Here's my thinking based on a recent renewal quote: The pricing works like this: pay 50% for renewal every year or 100% each time we decide to upgrade. So yearly maintenenace renewal is only cheaper when you plan on upgrading every year. If you upgrade every other year it’s a break even situation but you have the benefit of spreading the payments. Anything over 3 years then is a waste of money. It took my company 5 years to move from 5.5 to 8.5 although I was only hired in the last year and a half. But what about these great new features that are bound to come out? Well, FileMaker 5.5 met our needs for 5 years and I get the feeling that we can get at least two years or more out of 8.5. There are a few things I would like to see changed in FileMaker but they are all changes to existing features. Like many software companies, changing old features (ex. dynamic filtering of portals) typically takes a back seat to new, exciting features (ex. Web Viewer). So while I have a list of things I would love to have and ahave submitted official requests for them I have no guarantee that FileMaker will deliver. In fact, I don’t even know if FileMaker agrees that such changes would be useful. So if I don't know that I will get the features I want and I can last at least two years or more without them, why bother paying the maintenenace? Edited August 23, 2006 by Guest
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6924 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now