Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

loss of win2k support irksome

Recommended Posts

What exactly in FM 9 required FMI/Apple to drop win2k support? Does anybody know why? As far as I can tell, the only logical reason(s) would be:

1. Pressure from Microsoft(you would think Apple

would relish the opportunity to show Windows

users that they wasted their money and time

buying XP)

2. Not wanting to test in the extra OS

3. Too much dependence on Windows features(which

is a trap FMI/Apple has never been known to

fall into)

It would seem to me that FMI/Apple could have issued a warning and denied tech support to users who wished to install on win2k rather than absolutely not allowing installation. The basic underpinnings of XP are very similar(if not identical) to win2k and I would be willing to bet FM 9 would work just fine on win2k in most circumstances. Most of my small customers love win2k for its low system requirements and seemingly higher dependability than XP Pro. Many have ordered new machines with XP Pro only to revert them to the copies of win2k from their junked PC's. The win2k Terminal Services Licensing is also much more generous than Server 2003 in that you are not required to purchase CAL's for machines with win2k or better client OS. I understand that win2k is old, but banning installation altogether seems a bit severe when most apps that will work on XP will work on win2k. Most people could give a rat's a** what operating system they have as long as it does the job without many hiccups. I think companies like FMI/Apple shoot themselves in the foot when they exclude a good portion of the potential user base by forcing them to pay the Microsoft/Apple OS tax (and all the headaches that go along with any OS change)along with the considerable expense of FM. The problem is obviously even worse for the poor Mac user who gets repeatedly trodden on financially by the cult when developers insist on the very latest version of OS X every six months to a year(my brother loves his Macs but hates the OS/App merry-go-round as he constantly finds that he cannot buy any new software without upgrading his OS for another $129). Requiring OS X 10.4.8 is analogous to requiring Vista, thank god FMI/Apple aren't as cruel to Win users as they are to their own!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess would be stability, im sure they tested pro on windows 2000, they took the time to test server. Possibly theres something that doesnt run properly, a great example of this is FileMaker Server 9 on Vista. When i tried to do this to see what happens, the Vista machine physically screamed at me over and over again until i removed the installation. I thought it was funny, but still slightly disappointed.

The world may never know :

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't really equate requiring 10.4 to requiring vista, since tiger has been out for more than two years and the next release is pending...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


FileMaker is really no nicer to Windows than it is to Mac OS. Windows simply supports its OS for free from version to version (i.e. Windows XP, SP1, SP2 and soon SP3). You will however notice that 8.5 required SP2 to run it.

Edited by Guest

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Testing requirements and moving on from ancient OS. FMP 9 doesn't run on OS 10.3.9 either.

I wish they were more stringent where it comes to Server OS, but that's another story for another day.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


I half agree with what you say about making newer OS's compulsory. However, just how far back should FMI go in checking that FMP runs on the various OS's?

More to the point, I think you have the wrong end of the stick re W2K vs. XP Pro.

Initially, XP was hopeless; it is now very reliable and, in my experience, leaves W2K for dead in almost every respect.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't Microsoft officially EOL Windows 2000?


Microsoft still provides support for 2k, however I don't foresee it happening for too awfully long ;)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Justin Close
      I was doing a bit of work for a client who is running FM9 clients, connecting to a file hosted on an FM11 server.  I don't have FM9, so was doing development on FM11.  I thought I had checked out that everything was compatible, but I somehow generated a calculation that doesn't evaluate on 9, but does on 11.  The components of the calculations and custom functions used all appear to be innocuous...  I  am hoping someone here knows what I tripped up on.
      Here's the field calculation, and the 2 custom function definitions that it uses.  The entire point of this calculation is to take a mish-mash text field that they have and make it sort nicely.  For this bit I added, I'm just concerning myself with sorting some suffix numbers that occur between parentheses, e.g. 12345(A-1).
      Field calculation definition: Let ( [ _fileNum = Files::File Number ; //Position of 1st open/close parens, and then extract the text between them: _sParen = Position ( _fileNum ; "(" ; 1 ; 1 ) + 1; _eParen = Position ( _fileNum ; ")" ; 1 ; 1 ) ; _suffix = Middle ( _fileNum ; _sParen ; _eParen - _sParen) ; //Count the leading digits before any non-digit character, e.g. an alpha, or dash or space, etc. _count = CountPrefixDigits ( _suffix ; 0 ) ; //Remove extraneous characters (dash, space): _suffix = Substitute ( _suffix; ["-";""]; [" " ; ""] ) ; //Pad out the string to min 5 characters (helps 75-A sort next to 75): _suffix = _suffix & Left ( "!!!!!" ; 5 - Length (_suffix) ); //Reverse the character sequence (so the Code() call works out better): _suffix = ReverseString ( _suffix ) ]; _count & Code ( _suffix ) //prepend the digit count, but don't encode that count, just the rest of it ) -------------------- 'CountPrefixDigits ( aString ; aCounter )' custom function: If ( IsEmpty ( GetAsNumber ( Left ( aString ; 1 ) ) ) ; aCounter ; CountPrefixDigits ( Right ( aString ; Length ( aString) - 1 ) ; aCounter + 1 ) ) -------------------- 'ReverseString (aString)' custom function: If ( Length ( aString ) > 0 ; ReverseString ( Right ( aString ; Length ( aString ) - 1 ) ) & Left ( aString ; 1 ) ; Left ( aString ; 1 ) )  
    • By Tumma K
      Hello, All!

      I am an aspiring developer for Filemaker. The company I work with is stuck in the past working off of Filemaker Pro 4.1

      I was given the task of bringing us up to Filemaker Pro/Server 13. So far my conversion prototypes are successful but we recently had a layout issue that can only be fixed in versions 3-6 (as the file is an .fp3) I work off of a macbook while our network is all Windows 7. In order for me to repair the layouts without tampering our active database, I decided the best option is to repair a copy of our solutions off the network. Unfortunately, when I go to download the trial version of Filemaker Pro 6 off of the respected website, the file is corrupt! I've tried multiple times, with different extraction apps and in different directories.

      My question is;

      Does anyone know a place where I could obtain version 6 (or better yet, 4.0) for an OSX computer? I've looked everywhere!
      Thank you for your time,
      Tumma K.
    • By MacSig
      Hello everyone.
      How can I set the calculated value of field C to the number of records having field A equal to the value inserted to field A and field B equal to the value inserted to field B?
      For instance with the following situation
      record 1  =>  A = "house", B = "pay" 
      record 2  =>  A = "house", B = "win" 
      record 3  =>  A = "car", B = "pay" 
      record 4  =>  A = "house", B = "pay" 
      when I create a new record having  A = "house", B = "pay"  C should automatically be 2 (since record 1 and 4 have the same A, B.
    • By MrEddByrnes
      I'm hoping my question can have a happy ending. In the mid-90's, I purchased Filemaker 3. When Filemaker 5.5 Pro was released, I bought the update CD, which requires the user to either have FM 3 installed or to have the installation CD for FM 3. I've used it all these years, most recently with Windows XP Pro, and it has worked just fine. The databases I began with were long ago converted to FM Pro 5.5 databases.
      I'm still using FM Pro 5.5 on a laptop with WinXP Pro, but in 2013, I purchased a PC with Windows 8. I haven't been able to install FM 3 on it, therefore can't install FM Pro 5.5. I am retired and rarely use Filemaker, but I have a few Filemaker databases I'd like to add to my Win 8 machine. I don't feel it's worth upgrading FM for the sake of using a couple of databases.
      Has anyone else run into this situation and/or have a (possible) solution? Is there perhaps any other software that can read FM 5.5 databases? Thanks in advance for your help.
    • By bmill
      I am using a custom filemaker solution for medical office billing written with fp5 running on a mac with snow leopard. In addition, I have a patient management db (which I wrote) that is linked through pt. ID number to the billing program allowing transfer of some demographic information (name, DOB, etc).
      Other than being limited by hardware restrictions, the billing program serves our needs for now and upgrading to fp12 will take some time (and money).  In the meantime, I am upgrading my pt. management program to fp13 and would like to move new patient demographic information from the billing program ( fp5 running on snow leopard through Parallels) and the new pt management program ( fp13 running on OS X 10.9) on the same mac.   
      Ideally, demographic information would be entered once into fp5 and then a scipt would make the data available for fp13.
      Any ideas on how to make this work?
  • Who Viewed the Topic

    1 member has viewed this topic:
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.