Jump to content
Claris Engage 2025 - March 25-26 Austin Texas ×

This topic is 7346 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Posted

The download is REALLY SLOW. You may want to wait until the wee hours to give traffic some time to slow down. It took me over an hour to download 108 MB on a T1.

Posted

1. New in FileMaker Pro 7.0v3

1.1. Text editing

1.1.1. In Mac OS X, styled text copied from another application now retains

its styles when pasted into a field in FileMaker Pro. Styled text copied

from FileMaker Pro also maintains its styles when pasted into an application

that supports the RTF format.

1.1.2. Corrected line-breaking issues with specific characters, including

parenthesis, bracket, forward slash, backslash, and some Japanese katakana

characters.

1.1.3. In Windows 2000 and Windows XP at the 100% scale, font smoothing is

no longer applied to onscreen text with

Posted

"1.7.4. All values in a repeating field can now be displayed using a value

list based on related field values."

Woohoo! I'm back in business! yay.gif

Now, if I could only get the download to stop stalling at 99%. Banghead.gif

Posted

Stephen, Thanks for the bug fix list (I swear I looked everywhere for that!)

It looks like this should cover a lot of the problems we've been seeing. Good news! grin.gif

Posted

1.7.1. Type-ahead now works correctly in a value list that uses related

field values and that is sorted by the second field.

Just tested this, seems to work much better.

Posted

"1.4.1. In order to be consistent with other script steps and with previous

versions of FileMaker Pro, the Go to Related Record script step no longer

brings the related window to the front automatically, except when used from

a button. In order to bring the related window to the front, you must add a

Select Window step to the script."

This is really wierd and dispite you saying so isn't the way it works in FM6. Why would you have a script that says "Go to Related Record" and "Display using layout" and not have it actually display that record??? If you didn't want this behavior you should have an option of not displaying the related records, but otherwise I think I have to put this change in the "Bonehead" change category!

This topic is 7346 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.