Jump to content

cant get Exit Application to work in IWP


richgod
 Share

This topic is 5751 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Hi I am trying to use the Exit Application script step with a button in IWP.

I believe this is the best way to log users out and make sure the number of licenses does not exceed the limit (10) in my case.

Unfortunately, I am hosting the IWP on a client copy running under Filemaker server 6, so I dont think I can use the diconnect when idle setting.

I dont know any alternative to this?

Any suggestions please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With FM6, the limit of 10 is not for concurrent usage... it's over a rolling 12-hour period, so whether users log out isn't specifically related to that user limit. Also since there aren't sessions in IWP with v6, there's no way to end a session.

If you use v7, IWP uses actual sessions, and does not use a client copy to process the transactions. Everything is server-based with Filemaker Server Advanced, and the IWP limit is 100 concurrent users.

If you use the client by itself without FMS to do IWP, the limit is 5 concurrent users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reed, thanks for your helpful answer. Actually I realised later that Exit Application is not listed for Version 6 IWP.

So, does your answer mean that each IP addresse automatically drops out of the count 12 hours after the last usage even if I left the web page open? What degree of closure do I need to ensure for the drop to occur? Since the app is used by day shift workers, this could be promising.

I could still host it on a client or on a copy of FMPRO 5 that not shared over the LAN?

I think version 7 , probably version 8 and FMS advanced, is the way to go. It would open the site to converting most all of the applications to IWP - a much easier thing to maintain and expand. Especially for an outside developer like myself. Only problem is the site has FMS 6 running and version 5 on client workstations, so I guess that would need to be upgraded also. Would you agree?

Regards and thanks,

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they leave the page open they will still drop off the 10-user count, 12 hours from the last request made to the server. So as long as another action requesting data from the server is not made by a user, the count is not reset.

You can host IWP users without needing FM Server, simply using a copy of FM5 or 6, but there is no way to do automated live backups as you can do with the server version... So you have to be vigilant about doing manual backups to avoid data loss.

If you upgrade to server v7(or v8), you pretty much have to upgrade any clients connecting to it to at least v7. Versions 5 and 6 worked together for the most part, and versions 7 and 8 work together, but v7 completely changed the file format, and is not backwards compatible with older clients. (However, since IWP is so much improved, you may be able to minimize the # of FM7 clients you use, and switch them to web clients)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 10 IWP guests are all connecting to one FMP client, and they don't interact with the server directly as clients. Also, FM Server doesn't know whether you bought a 10-user license. The licenses go with the client software... However, if you use more than one copy of non-volume licensed software (with the same serial number) on the server at the same time, the second one that's opened will quit with a license error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reed,

Apologies about being obsessive - seeing is believing - you probably have - but I dont have a network to play with.

I am not sure I understand the meaning of non volume licensed versions.Do you mean if you buy the basic FMPro without any ten or greater user licenses?

I presume I can share to the web on any machine that has a client installed, and for such a low traffic volume (max five per day), I could even do it without the recommended configurarion of a dedicated machine, running in services mode.

Does this make sense to you?

My main issue will be rationing of licenses, until I get buy in to converting a couple of the exisitng apps over to Filemaker Server 8 advanced when it arrives.

Thanks a million for your help.

Regards,

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fairly certain that the FMPro licenses do not apply to IWP. The licenses are only for each copy of FileMaker Pro you have running at one time.

Conceivably, as far as the license is concerned, you could have 1000 people hitting the database through IWP at any given time.

Examples:(assume all machines are connecting at once)

->1 client with FMPro serving via IWP, and 10 machines connecting over IWP - 1 FMPro license

->1 server with FMServer, and 10 machines that connect over IWP - 1 FMServer license

->10 machines, 1 server, each with FMPro installed and connecting to the server through FMPro - 10 FMPro licenses and 1 FMServer license

Edited by Guest
I can't spell.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

apd has this wrong with regard to the number of web-based clients you can have. Filemaker help clearly states that publishing a database in IWP under Filemaker Pro is limited to 10 database files and 5 concurrent users. If you plan on having more people connecting via the web, you'll have to move to FMS.

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The web companion in FMP 6, also had something called IWP, but it was much more limited in functionality than the current version. The upside for 6 was that you could actually do CWP with FMP via CDML. Now you pretty much need server advanced to do any kind of custom web publishing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is 5751 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By JDW
      Our company still uses FMP 11 Advanced because hosting online via IWP is much, much cheaper than hosting with a modern version of FMP.  Currently, we pay double to have two different FMP 11 databases hosted online.  One database contains 900 records and is open to the public with no password, and the other has several thousand records and requires a password.  
      In hopes of cutting our hosting cost in half, I would like to combine the two databases into one database, such that we need only pay to host 1 database.  But our need to password protect certain records remains.  
      In other words, I want to put the content that doesn't require a password inside the FMP database file that has data we want to protect.  I know it's possible to combine the two databases, but that would mean we can no longer use a main password to lockout the entire file, as that would lock out everybody.  I would like to know if I can use FMP 11 Advanced to password protect only certain records within a single database file?
      Thanks.
    • By AlesD
      Hi I can not fiddle out how to make it work. I have tried several browsers with same result. We are using FM 12 server. I tried this file paths
      file:///C:/file.jpg
      C:/file.jpg
      file://localhost/C:/file.jpg
      and few others
       
      I'm using this code in the Web Viewer which is working fine in FM client but not in browser
      "data:text/html, <html> <head> <style type=text/css> " & table::style & " </style> </head> <body> <div class='thumb'> <span class='helper'></span><img class='thumb' src='" & table::ThumbnailPath & "'> </div> </body> </html>"  
      If it's caused by fact image is not present in web site folder as stated in document then my question is if it possible use unc network path in filename like file://///other_than_fmserver/networkpath/file.jpg. I wasn't successful either. 
      Any help appreciated
       
      Thank you
    • By KevinArevalo
      Good morning! I need some help getting something working.
       
      We have a company website, and we are trying to create a instant web publishing portal for our customers to login and view their open invoices. Pretty simple. We have all of our information on a FileMaker solution that is hosted with FileMaker Server 12. The problem is we can't get it to work the way we want it to. 
       
      This is our idea and how we kind of want it to work. We want the have our customers create their accounts/passwords on our actual website. We will store their account information on our web server. We will authenticate their login on our web server. Then, after they log into our website, we want to take their username, bypass the filemaker instant web publishing login page, and then set their username (which they used to log into our website, not filemaker) to a global variable or a field or something, we just need it in filemaker so we can do searches on it. We have the instant web publishing layouts built and we can get all that part working fine, we have the login authentication working on our site, that part is fine. It's just bridging the two together. 
      We are using WordPress to build the website, and our site is hosted on GoDaddy. Our problem is that we can't find a way to auto-login and bypass the login web publishing page. We currently have one account called "WebLogin" which we have been trying to use as a general login (since the actual customer login is authenticated on our website, not FileMaker) but we can't seem to bypass the page. I found this page through google searching: http://lnx.acidsoft.net/problemsolved/bypass-filemaker-iwp-login-via-url.html
      and tried to do it the way that he describes, but it is not working. It gives me an error saying:
      Bad Request
      The server could not process your request due to a missing command: ""
       
      And I get another dialog box that says: 
      Bad Request
      The server could not process your request because your session has timed out, been closed, or communication with the server has been lost.
      Please reselect the database to begin a new session. If you cannot open the database, please contact your database administrator.
       
      That is one of the problems, how can I resolve this?
       
      My other problems is we are trying to pass through the username that the customer uses to login to our website as a variable in filemaker or even set it to a field. I am not sure how to do this. Is this even possible?
      Thank you so much!
    • By djlane
      I have an application that was using IWP under FM Server 12, to allow my friends and friends of friends to upload their golf scores, and my system would calculate their USGA handicaps.
       
      After upgrading to FM Server 13, IWP not longer exists, and WebDirect does not support mobile devices.
       
      So, I set up an alternative server using FM12.
       
      A lot of guys that I don't have contact details for, used that IWP based system to upload golf scores. So I don't have a way to tell them all the new URL.
       
      Using the old IWP URL, you are presented with a screen that says "The requested page is not found. Check the URL you are using to access FileMaker WebDirect."
       
      I want to edit that page to add some additional information telling them the new URL etc. But I can't find any document with that content in any FM Server folder or sub folder. 
       
      Anyone know where I can find it ?
       
      thanks
    • By cchaski
      Hi, I have a databse hosted in IWP that uses Supercontainer for people to upload documents. The process works fine when I use FMPA 12 to access the hosted database, but when I go through the web browser (the IWP approach), the process does not work. A button "Upload Doc" calls a script that goes to the upload layout, generates the SC id code for the record, shows the webviewer with upload and delete buttons. This works fine when I am using FMP to access the database, but this does not work when I use IWP. When I click the button in IWP, nothing happens. Any ideas?? Thanks in advance!
  • Who Viewed the Topic

    9 members have viewed this topic:
    Richmilnix  dansmith65  nsdodgers  xochi  mr_vodka  doughemi  Franco Pagano  temp007  Wim Decorte 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.