Newbies epatrick Posted October 15, 2015 Newbies Posted October 15, 2015 I need some help importing a RSS 2.0 XML into FileMaker Pro Adv 10. I'm trying to modify a xslt file that came with FM. When I use this xslt it tries to map the parent Recipients and not the child Recipient. I'm stuck and could use a hand. Any thoughts on what to modify or add would be much appreciated? Here is the xlst: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"><!--File: msdso_elem.xslt Transforms data in an ELEMENT based MSDSO grammarinto the FMPXMLRESULT grammar, suitable for import. =============================================================== Copyright © 2002 FileMaker, Inc.All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with orwithout modification, are permitted provided that the followingconditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of the FileMaker, Inc. nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS ANDCONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OFMERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FORANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, ORCONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OFSUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; ORBUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY,WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDINGNEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THISSOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. ===============================================================--> <xsl:template match="/*"> <FMPXMLRESULT xmlns="http://www.filemaker.com/fmpxmlresult"> <ERRORCODE>0</ERRORCODE> <PRODUCT BUILD="" NAME="" VERSION=""/> <DATABASE DATEFORMAT="M/d/yyyy" LAYOUT="" NAME="" RECORDS="{count(/*/*)}" TIMEFORMAT="h:mm:ss a"/> <METADATA> <xsl:for-each select="/*/*[position()=1]/*"> <FIELD> <xsl:attribute name="EMPTYOK">YES</xsl:attribute> <xsl:attribute name="MAXREPEAT">1</xsl:attribute> <xsl:attribute name="NAME"><xsl:value-of select="name()"/></xsl:attribute> <xsl:attribute name="TYPE">TEXT</xsl:attribute> </FIELD> </xsl:for-each> </METADATA> <RESULTSET> <xsl:attribute name="FOUND"><xsl:value-of select="count(child::*)"/></xsl:attribute> <xsl:for-each select="child::*"> <ROW> <xsl:attribute name="MODID">0</xsl:attribute> <xsl:attribute name="RECORDID">0</xsl:attribute> <xsl:for-each select="child::*"> <COL> <DATA> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </DATA> </COL> </xsl:for-each> </ROW> </xsl:for-each> </RESULTSET> </FMPXMLRESULT> </xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet> Here is the XML: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"> <Recipients> <Recipient> <First_name>Adam</First_name> <Last_name>Smith</Last_name> <Address1>123 main street</Address1> <Address2 /> <City>Lakewood ranch</City> <State>NY</State> <Zip>10012</Zip> <Country>USA</Country> <Cust_Phone>941-555-1212</Cust_Phone> <Company_name /> <L_num>Z3116-01</L_num> <Qty>50</Qty> <Promo>G147571</Promo> <Toll_num>1-888-238-0030</Toll_num> <email>[email protected]</email> <email2>[email protected]</email2> <repName /> <repPhone /> <CustomText>Adam Smith</CustomText> <IntOrderId>230839</IntOrderId> <OrderDateTime>2015-10-07 14:26:44</OrderDateTime> </Recipient> </Recipients></rss>
comment Posted October 15, 2015 Posted October 15, 2015 That's the trouble with generic stylesheets: they only fit what the authors envisioned as generic XML sources. However, the X in XML stands for eXtensible, and there's no way a single stylesheet can fit all. There is no such thing as a generic XML. You didn't tell us what exactly do you want to import, so here's a stylesheet that will offer to import everything from your source; just select the fields you want and map them to your own fields in the import dialog. <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="/rss"> <FMPXMLRESULT xmlns="http://www.filemaker.com/fmpxmlresult"> <ERRORCODE>0</ERRORCODE> <PRODUCT BUILD="" NAME="" VERSION=""/> <DATABASE DATEFORMAT="" LAYOUT="" NAME="" RECORDS="" TIMEFORMAT=""/> <!-- DEFINE FIELDS --> <METADATA> <xsl:for-each select="Recipients/Recipient[1]/*"> <FIELD NAME="{name()}" TYPE="TEXT" EMPTYOK="YES" MAXREPEAT=""/> </xsl:for-each> </METADATA> <!-- IMPORT DATA --> <RESULTSET FOUND=""> <xsl:for-each select="Recipients/Recipient"> <ROW MODID="" RECORDID=""> <xsl:for-each select="*"> <COL><DATA><xsl:value-of select="."/></DATA></COL> </xsl:for-each> </ROW> </xsl:for-each> </RESULTSET> </FMPXMLRESULT> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> 1
beverly Posted October 16, 2015 Posted October 16, 2015 and hopefully the first element Recipient has all the child elements (including empty ones) that are needed for all the Recipients. I'm my experience empty elements may not be in a transmission (XML source) at all. Getting an XSD (or DTD or schema document of some sort) is the best way to assure all elements (and attributes) are imported if needed. Then "generic" is not the way to go, but explicitly calling the elements or attributes needed. beverly
comment Posted October 16, 2015 Posted October 16, 2015 and hopefully the first element Recipient has all the child elements (including empty ones) that are needed for all the Recipients. I see empty elements in the given example, so I assume all Recipient nodes have the same child elements (and in the same order). But I agree that this is an important point, and the assumption should be stated explicitly. 1
Recommended Posts
This topic is 3667 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now